Reasons:






  • 1. Past experience with outside ministries and persons demonstrates vetting it is required.
  • 2. The Mi’Kmaq differ from the inland Indigenous that most ministries are exposed to.
  • 3. The people wish it and need it.
  • 4. The people have become sensitive to change and misunderstanding.
  • 5. The people are easily influenced for good or bad by outsiders for many reasons.
  • 6. Language, style, delivery, personal beliefs and doctrine are a sensitive area impacting.
  • 7. There are unspoken and hidden rules about the culture and the people affecting the complexities of the church plant.
  • 8. The culture is historically catholicized and not so mainstreamed as the rest of Canada.
  • 9. The ongoing work is momentous and can be negatively impacted by an outsider who is not vetted or oriented, which could render the experience for all counterproductive.
  • 10. There is a Zero operating budget available to date for overhead costs or honoraria to cover ministries and teams.
  • Example areas for screening include:

  • Expectation
  • Ostentation and posturing of the 5-fold, enabling entertainment for ‘event only’ believers, insistence entry to get an “experience”, build ministry portfolio, ‘enlighten’ the local missionary-pastor.
  • Lack of follow-up
  • Manpower prior, during and post
  • Debriefings, not just orientations
  • Accommodations
  • Local Missionary-Pastor must benefit 100% from outside ministries to be truly helpful to the people.
  • Attachments and blind vulnerabilities
  • Personal beliefs are observed and picked up by locals, especially from those with charisma or gifts
  • Socio-Economic dynamics both ways can hurt long-term